S-World AGI — US$ 1039 Trillion — Basic

S-World™ AGI

Retrospective Introduction by Nick Ray Ball December 10th, 2022

https://nickrayball.com/$1039_Trillion_BASIC.php
https://www.s-world.org/$1039_Trillion_Original.php

Š-ŔÉŚ™2021—⌂≥ÉL.

How Š-ŔÉŚ™ Generates US$ 1039 Trillion by 2080

Taking Malawi from Zero to One Percent of GDP

A Supereconomics Story

After this introduction, the following feature is one of my favourite S-World AGI Technology 7. S-RES summaries, from 23rd August 2021, about how the 10 Technologies (t10t) work for developing economies in Southern Africa. And whilst the actual example is from Malawi, taking it, in theory, from almost Zero to One per cent of global GDP between 2024 and 2080, generating $10.39 trillion, and after, because it was a non-zero-sum game and could be copied across Southern Africa, Southern America, India and across the developing world in 100 counties we arrive at the future title of $1039 Trillion. (And yes, for those who are following, that’s discounted to today’s value of money.

(See the links above under T7 S-RES, as of 10 Dec 2022 there are only links to 2017, but I have put in a day next week to add more, so I hope you will see them above. Note that the Videos from 2019 to 2020 called History 3, best present the preliminary work that this feature presents).

In application, due to infrastructure constraints, it now looks like S-RES is coming home to where it originated - South Africa. In an initiative called SA Butterfly, to be detailed and politically discussed in 2023 alongside its Western Economic equivalent American Butterfly 2023, due to be rewritten 11 years to the day after it began on Jan 1st, 2012.

For the original see: American Butterfly 2012 – Part 1. The Theory of Every Business – Part 2. Spiritually Inspired Software – Part 3. The Network on A String.

For those of you who don’t know macroeconomics, these figures will seem absurd, but this is macroeconomics over a people of 56 years and a $ trillion in such circumstances is the correct unit of account for making macroeconomic models.

I did however need 11 and a half years of work to spec out the technology required to apply the S-RES formula (to work out the underlying assumptions. For which let’s go back to what as best I can find, was the original inspiration, a report on Economic Black Holes, that led to one thing, then another, then another…

As best I can tell from reading the early work T7 S-RES originated from a BBC Newsnight program on March 15th, 2011, with Political Editor: Allegra Stratton about economic black holes, which would eventually inspire: Deeply Entangled Macro and Microeconomic Systems — Inspired by Chaos Theory, Quantum Mechanics, M-Theory, and most recently Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG) — Controlled by Human Hybrid Artificial General Intelligence — S-World AGI

From BBC Newsnight, reported by Allegra Stratton on March 15th, 2011

“Politics likes dramatic metaphors; a government budget has a black hole we say, except in a dictionary definition it’s usually nothing of the sort. A black hole is a void that sucks stuff in, there’s no return. Look to the future of the UK’s public finances and this becomes a bit truer. The government's own official forecasters show that on the horizon the costs of the state go way up while our means to pay, shrink. Money gets sucked in now that’s a black hole.

When we talk about the debt and the deficit now, we are only really in the foothills of a much larger impending debate about the public finances. The Institute for finical studies thinks that on current costs the amount we will be spending on health and pensions will go up by as much as 5% of national income. In other calculations they have done they think that all in were looking to find an extra £100 Billion every year for a generation.”

This eventually led me to study and amazingly make significant use of LQG (Quantum Look Gravity) within t10t. And sure, it is relative to my 2011 Kobayashi Maru Debt to GDP Game form

But it did begin the journey to T 7. S-RES, of which the following is the simplest presentation thus far.

Important note.
In the week of the 24th, as has been my fate since 2016, I worked on the principal presentation of the year, this year in 2022 it was: S-World AGI - UK Butterfly. In the making of the UK Butterfly, I realised I had made a terminology error.

RES (2012) > ŔÉŚ (201) > S-RES (2018) > Š-ŔÉŚ™ and The City (2020) > Š-ŔÉŚ™2021—⌂≥ÉL (2021) > Š-ŔÉŚ Inflation Control (2022) > S-World AGI (2023)

Are not systems to increase the money supply, technically they speed up the money supply and efficiency of the system which increases production - Š-ŔÉŚ is then a 32x Growth System, due to Technology 8 and its subsystem Tax Symmetry we need to use about 75% of that system for stopping climate change and to responsibly manage recourses. But like Ed Witten says in M-Theory you get general relativity for free, from T8 and T9 we don’t only stop economic emigration, we reverse it, and in theory, that sure can be debated and is very general, because in richer countries pullulation (new births in the country) are steady or in many cases, declining, by lifting the developing world, maybe, just maybe out pops population stability as well?

But even with 75% of the financial power of T7 and t10t, with a Śpin of 32x to production, that still leaves 8x = 800%, (call it 40% a year for 20 years) whereas right now, most countries are wishing they could get back to 3%.

And whilst the example below does generalise the 100 countries to include the West and Rich economies, this is a completely different animal as we must include inflation, which we will hear about next year in American Butterfly II 2023 (AGI for the USA.)


So please enjoy, and appreciate, this is not S-World AGI, this is the seventh of the nine Technologies and T10. S-World Angelwing creates a combinatorial explosion from T1 to T9 and thus creates 'as-if' AGI.

In that, if China looks from a distance, they will assume, in terms of growth, money, devastating efficiency, and its beneficial nature in almost all areas, that S-World (as-is it were) AGI, is real — AGI Artificial General Intelligence, which the most optimistic AI researchers believe is forty years away if it’s to happen at all.

---

The Original Paper From:
https://www.s-world.org/$1039_Trillion_BASIC.php

How Š-ŔÉŚ™ Generates US$ 1039 Trillion by 2080

Taking Malawi from Zero to One Percent of GDP

A Supereconomics Story

By Nick Ray Ball 23rd August 2021

Click here for the longer version of this page.

Below we see a simple diagram of a bath tub in which the amount of water flowing into the bathtub is equal to the amount of water flowing out. (Note the out-flow at the bottom is 10x magnification.)

Next we see that if 90% of the water was recycled - the total amount water enjoyed by the bath increases from 80 to 152 Gallons.

Of course in this case the water would overfill and spill onto the floor, which is not desired.
But what if we exchange the water for money?

Next, we see the same situation but with money.
In 2024 a network of businesses has $6.32 billion in savings and revenue (Š & Ŕ) of which 90% is spent on goods and services from other businesses or personnel in the same network.

Which at an 'É' (recycle-Éfficiency) of 90% increases the cash flow as follows;
The initial $6.32 + the recyled $5.68 billion = $12 billion.

However for this exercise, for History 3 (the simulation we are analyzing), we report only the pre Śpin income, which when some other items are added and taken away equals $5,685,975,000.

We will see this figure appear as the first entry on the 2024 to 2080 History 3 cash flow statement presented shortly

Now we apply Śpin (Ś) to the 2025 figures . As before instead of spending the money once a year, we spend it twice creating $14.89 billion in cash flow. Plus, critically, $7.10 billion remains at the end of the year, and is transferred to 2026, this is called Šavings (Š) or sometimes The Law of Conservation of Revenue

The following year (2026) Śpin increases to 3, so we spend the money three times in a year creating $26.85 billion.
Note the figures are effected by aditional in and out flows and they wront tally without them. To see the additional 'in and out flows' go to: 11.11__S-RES__BASIC

The Š-ŔÉŚ Equation

High-Octane Financial Engineering

Pecunia, si uti scis, ancilla est; si nescis, domina.

(If you know how to use money, money is your slave; if you do not, money is your master)

History 3 - Malawi Network - 2024

Now let us look at this on the spreadsheet
To download the spreadsheet follow this link ; Download Spreadsheet 8.62b .
(You may find your anti virus warns you not to open this, you may ignoor this warning, or contact us and we can email it to you, either way the spreadsheet is important.)

Below we see The Š-ŔÉŚ™ Calculator in Year 1 (2024)
Revenue and Savings in red x 90% É x Śpin 1 = $5.68 Billion (USD), which takes 365 days.

This $5.68 billion is divided as Ť (tenders) between 2,048 businesses who each receive an average of $2.77 million.
At the end of the year, the $5.68 billion in the networks central bank converts to Š (savings) to re-emerge as cash flow in 2025

History 3 - Malawi Network - 2025

Next, we see year 2 savings and revenue are $8.56 billion and Śpin 2 forces all the cash flow to be spent before 11th July 2025.

É is now 91%, so 91% of the cash flow remains in the central bank, transferred from one network company to another, and another, in a process called The Sienna Equilibrium. (a next-generation spreadsheet for this is in progress.)
On the 12th of July, the cash flow remaining in the bank, now $7.75 billion is again distributed to the now 4,096 companies averaging $3.63 million each, to be spent before the end of the year, again with an É of 91%. At which point $7.09 billion remains in the network central bank and it converted to Š (savings) in 2026.

Essential to know, the businesses in the network use the Ten Technologies software to set prices and handle all but petty cash accounting. There is a massive amount of detail for this software.

History 3 - Malawi Network - 2032

Now we can really start to get a handle on the Š-ŔÉŚ™ process and see its magic.
Moving now to 2032, we see É is now 99% (which may be higher than can be achieved, but with 8 years of practice, we would get close).
With an É of 99%, the amount of cash flow lost to É (spent on raw materials, goods and services from companies outside the network.) is minuscule. Note the Spend By Dates, the initial cash flow is spent in the first 42 days, the second Śpin is also 42 days then; 41, 41, 41, 40, 40, 39, 39 days. Eight Śpins generating $106 billion in cash flow, and about half that in GDP.
This figure is then halved because of the CFV (Cash Flow to GDP Variable) at 50% the CFV considers the GDP double-counting problem presented in David A. Moss's; A Concise Guide to Macroeconomics.
Like Einstein’s cosmological constant, this may seem unnecessary, but in the end game become necessary.

In this year, 2032, we are now dealing with 24,576 businesses in the network, each on average with 32 personnel creating 786,432 very high salary Jobs. (Before the many allocations the average wage plus bonus is about 80 times the average income of a Malawian. (when calculated using World Bank 2019 Malawi GDP per Capita as income.)

History 3 - Malawi Network - 2048

In 2048 we move É to 99.5% - now the cash flow is circulating every 14.5 days.

History 3 - Malawi Network - 2080

I stop incresing Śpin at Śpin 32 in 2055, and we see Śpin 32 with an É of 95.5% continue untill 2080 at which point cash flow is $8,204,082,483,521 and GDP is $4,102,041,241,761 in the year 2080. We will see this figure discounted later in this presenation.

What is
"Increasing The Money Supply?"

Click here for the original article.

Š-ŔÉŚ™ History 3 - 2024 to 2080 - Discounted Cash Flow.

So far, we have shown the Š-ŔÉŚ™ powered Cash Flow in the years; 2024, 2025, 2032, 2048 and 2080.
Next, we work from the original spreadsheet tab: 'H3) ŠÉŚ-v5 | S-World History 3b' which amongst other things gives us a cash flow figure each year from 2024 to 2080.
These 56 cash flow totals are then copied to spreadsheet tab: H3) Total Cash Flow & GDP After we add it all up and cash flow equals +/-$140 Trillion, but for this figure to have any meaning we need to discount it.

The discounting method I have used is simply to change the 4 growth variables at the top of the H3) ŠÉŚ-v5 | S-World History 3b spreadsheet to Zero, which gives us a figure of $23,321,291,435,916.
Next, we apply the CFV of 50% making $11,660,645,717,958.
That is Malawi's discounted GDP from 2024 to 2080 as it climbs from zero to one percent of GDP.

Critically, History 3 only includes some token trade figures, so in terms of global expansion/implementation, it's a non-zero-sum-game, almost all of that GDP is made and then consumed in Malawi, Malawi is not competing with South Africa, Tanzania, or anywhere else. And because of this, the model could be repeated over and over in different locations, just so long as each location can find a persistent buyer for at least one suburb.

At the very least, we should try for another 24 countries in Africa, but ideally every country in Africa. Add to that 25 Grand Śpin Networks in US states and other countries in the Americas, 15 in Europe, 15 in Asia and 10 others including Australia and New Zealand, making 99 others Grand Śpin Networks.

So we multiply the Malawi figures by 100 giving us $1,166,064,571,795,800 ($1,166Trillion)

Click here for an analysis of the Companies, Ťenders & Labour spreadsheet we see below (tab: H3) Jobs and Education 4) and a description of & Tax Symmetry.
Plus 14 different ways to increase cash flow, the Malawi Grand Śpin Network companies 64-cube and UK Butterfly companies 64-cube

Part 2 – Determined Cash Flows

Š-ŔÉŚ™2021—⌂≥ÉL.

The idea here is that we now throw away all revenue except the sale of city suburbs and consider the buyer for a suburb. If they buy a suburb at $1 billion a year plus 5% PA escalation, for at least 16 years then that revenue multiplied by Š-ŔÉŚ™ creates determined cash flows, like we see below, made from spreadsheet tabs S-World History 3 ⌂ = 100% and Total Cash Flow & GDP ⌂ = 100%.

There are two different types of determined economics at play here, first is for the buyer of a Suburb, second is for all the businesses in the Suburb. Both are 'combinatorial' - meaning they can interact with each other and other technologies and become far more than the sum of their parts)

So in the model where the only revenue is the City Sale the 100 loctions avarage is slightly lower at $1,039,484,468,031,450 ($1,039 Trillion)

For the businesses in the City or it's suburb, their success is predetermined.

Because the cash flow from the City Sale is incresed by up to 30x by Š-ŔÉŚ™ and is then distributed as Ťenders to the S-World businesses within. This income in all but the rarest of cases be sufficient to pay all bills, wages and bonuses.

Over the last 12 months, a lot of time has been devoted to making this system determined, and the following equation has been created for this purpose ⌂≥ÉL.

The equation reads as follows;
⌂ = The City/Suburb Sale
≥ = Must make the same or more than
É = recycle-Éfficiency
L = Leakage

The City (⌂) must make the same or more than (≥) recycle-Éfficiency (É) Leakage (L)

Which is easy enough if we get the software and the politics right

Š-ŔÉŚ™2021—⌂≥ÉL.

Thank you for Reading:

"$1039 Trillion BASIC"

Click here for some roughly written but all the same important Underlying Assumptions. Let us take a moment to understand the economics of Śpin.

New section needs completing that will discuss the case of TWF (The Window Factory - a hypothetical construction industry company) in 2025 Śpin 2 and 2055 Śpin 32. Labour is by far the easiest to explain/justify.
Labour receives 25% of cash flow...

Š-ŔÉŚ™2021—⌂≥ÉL.